Sanjar Fayziev vs Aliaksandr Liaonenka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
L W L W W L W L L LH2H: Fayziev 2 - 0 Liaonenka
They have played 5 sets in total, with Fayziev winning 4 and Liaonenka winning 1. The last match between Fayziev and Liaonenka was at the M15 Kazan, 14-10-2021, Second, I.hard with Sanjar Fayziev getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sanjar Fayziev | 2 |
| Aliaksandr Liaonenka | 0 |
M15 Kazan(14-10-2021)
6
0
6
3
| Fayziev | Stats | Liaonenka |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (5-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 899 | Ranking | 898 |
| 253 | Highest Rank | 770 |
| 30 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (249-197) | Career Total W/L | 51% (159-153) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats 
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve %
75%
(
3 of
4)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
2)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
5
Total Points Won
2
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 14 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:3:0 | Average Match Time | 1:3:0 |
| 67% (58/87) | 1st Serve % | 55% (46/83) |
| 60% (35/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (25/46) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 51% (42/83) | Return Points Win % | 43% (37/87) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sanjar Fayziev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Zgirovsky
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
95)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 7-5 10-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Adit Sinha
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
13 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Gabor Mathe
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aliaksandr Liaonenka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Xirui Han
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Castelnuovo
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (249/197) | Win/Loss | 51% (159/153) |
| 55% (564/459) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (362/344) |
| 52% (4936/4627) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3424/3373) |
| 57% (128/98) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (98/91) |
| 56% (74/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 48% (27/29) |
| 55% (47/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (34/33) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1677 | Aces Total | 1166 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 781 | Total Double Faults | 474 |
| 1:15:17 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 544.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 359.83 |
| 61% (13990/23065) | 1st Serve % | 64% (8682/13561) |
| 70% (9734/13990) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5965/8682) |
| 49% (4480/9075) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2243/4878) |
| 42% (987/2338) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (491/1170) |
| 40% (9346/23221) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4870/13242) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 13% (2/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (45/73) | Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 65% (202/110) | Futures W/L | 51% (155/149) |
| 57% (244/428) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (158/309) |
| 30% (3/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (64/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (36/67) |
| 50% (64/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (39/84) |
| 84% (247/207) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (171/141) |
| 16% (247/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (171/30) |
| 21% (199/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (140/17) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
